If Kia decides to return to Japan to marry, what is the counselor's ethical responsibility?

The counselor's ethical responsibility to ensure continuity of Kia's treatment is crucial, particularly in the context of a significant decision such as marriage and relocation. Maintaining continuity in treatment means that the counselor should support Kia in her journey, regardless of her choice to marry and move. This involves maintaining a therapeutic relationship and ensuring that she has access to the necessary resources and support systems as she transitions to a new environment.

By focusing on continuity, the counselor helps Kia navigate her emotional and mental well-being connected to the changes in her life, ensuring that her treatment does not abruptly end, which could hinder her progress. This can include coordinating care with a counselor in Japan or preparing Kia with coping strategies to manage potential challenges.

Other options do not align with the ethical responsibility of a counselor. Discouraging her decision could undermine Kia's autonomy. Providing resources for her fiancé might be beneficial but does not address Kia’s treatment needs specifically. Informing her parents poses confidentiality issues and may not be in Kia's best interest unless it is necessary for her treatment or safety. Thus, ensuring continuity of treatment stands out as the most appropriate and ethically sound responsibility in this scenario.